Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 07:29

What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Photos: the ‘No Kings’ rally in Oakland draws over 10,000 attendees - The Oaklandside
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Could Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ kill the OFR and accidentally sabotage SOFR? - Financial Times
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
2 new measles cases confirmed in Colorado - 9News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Fantasy Baseball SP Roundup 6/12: Nobody Beats Jay Mis - Pitcher List
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
$80 Xbox games seem like a steal compared to what I'm paying, and I don't like it - Windows Central
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
In what ways is Bollywood becoming westernized?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
This overlooked cause of PTSD is only going to get worse - vox.com